free hit counter
South Africa ordered by courts to protect white farmers in Zimbabwe
Africans in Government
Saturday, 28 November 2009 10:02
Bookmark and Share
Harare, Zimbabwe - A South African court has ordered the South African government to honour the findings of a regional tribunal which ruled that Zimbabwe's land reform programme was discriminatory, a human rights group said Friday.

AfriForum said the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria made an order in terms of which the South African government must undertake to respect and honour judgments by the Southern African Development Community (SADC) Tribunal in favour of commercial farmers in Zimbabwe, and to uphold the rights and remedies of victims of Zimbabwe's unlawful land expropriation exercise.

The Bilateral Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement (BIPPA) between Zimbabwe and South Africa, set to be signed on Friday in Harare, excludes farms that have been expropriated during Zimbabwe's land reform programme.

AfriForum and a South African farmer whose land had been expropriated under the land reform programme had sought the court's intervention to halt Friday's signing of the BIPPA.

The farmer, Louis Fick, is locked in a bitter legal wrangle with the Zimbabwean authority over the compulsory acquisition of his farm.

At least 244 South African farmers whose land was seized during the land invasions would be affected if the agreement excludes agriculture from sectors that would be protected by the pact.

The BIPPA was generally understood to have the effect to exclude the enforcement of the SADC Tribunal's orders, and to exempt Zimbabwe from liability for past human rights violations.

"This result would be contrary to South Africa's legal obligations in terms of its constitution and international law," AfriForum legal representative Willie Spies said.

Spies said the South African government had conceded in its court papers that the Zimbabwean land reform exercise was unlawful.

It also acknowledged the binding nature of the SADC Tribunal's rulings and international obligations arising from the regional court's orders.

The Zimbabwe government has refused to recognise the jurisdiction of the Windhoek-based Tribunal in Namibia, saying the statutes establishing the regional court had not yet been ratified by a required two-thirds majority of SADC's 15 member states.

He said the High Court order opened the way for registering the SADC Tribunal's judgments in South Africa and to pursue other remedies which AfriForum and other interested parties would now consider.

-APA

 

Related Search Words